In January 2025, in response to the re-election of the most xenophobic American president in a century, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints issued another brief, unsigned statement reiterating its nuanced stance on immigration. “We follow Jesus Christ by loving our neighbors,” it said. “The Savior taught that the meaning of ‘neighbor’ includes all of God’s children.”

This statement and similar ones that came before obviously weren’t enough, because many of the church’s American members feel no cognitive dissonance about cheering for the government’s wanton cruelty against marginalized people, then going to sacrament meeting to worship a man who said, “Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.”

I can already hear those members retorting, “We believe in obeying the law.” With that glib statement, they intentionally disregard all nuance and basic human empathy, and their pioneer ancestors who told the government to pound sand while they broke the law for decades to practice polygamy must be rolling in their graves. I could say something about their church more recently breaking the law for decades to hide the size of its stock portfolio from the government and the public, too.

Furthermore, these members refuse to accept the obvious reality that the government itself is not obeying the law. Not even its own unjust law, and certainly not what Mormons ostensibly believe to be God’s law.

The LDS Church is obviously concerned about this administration’s human rights abuses – it didn’t issue that immigration statement for no reason – so why has it chosen to remain silent as they escalate? Why won’t it condemn ICE’s brutal, lawless behavior in no uncertain terms? Why won’t it speak out against the concentration camp being set up in its backyard with our Mormon governor’s support? Why won’t it clarify – since this somehow isn’t obvious enough – that members cannot simultaneously love God and support people who tear-gas children?

The church’s consistent silence on other authoritarian regimes throughout the world is understandable, albeit not particularly admirable. But on its home turf in the United States, it still enjoys special privileges simply for being a church. While maintaining a general stance of political neutrality, “it reserves the right to address issues it believes have significant moral consequences.” In recent memory, though, it’s mostly exercised this right to impose its current teachings about gender and sexuality on people who don’t believe in them.

And what of the recently anointed prophet, Dallin H. Oaks? I could almost be convinced that this former lawyer and Supreme Court justice was raised up by the Lord for this time, when the Constitution is undeniably hanging by a thread. He’s been vocal about the importance of “our divinely inspired Constitution.”

Oaks obviously has a certain political leaning, but he’s no Ezra Taft Benson. He’s more nuanced than he gets credit for. In 2017, he acknowledged the reality of climate change and lamented “the politics of conflict and the uncertainties sponsored by the aggressive new presidential administration.” (That was Trump.) In 2020, he said that “Black lives matter” is an “eternal truth that all reasonable people should support.” I used to love this quote of his: “I find some wisdom in liberalism, some wisdom in conservatism, and much truth in intellectualism – but I find no salvation in any of them.”

Yes, I vehemently disagree with many opinions Oaks has expressed – you can guess which ones – but I thought his refusal to back down on them in the face of widespread disapproval at least showed a degree of courage and integrity. Given his past demonstrations of nuance, I had hope that as the prophet, he would use the same courage and integrity to defend democracy and human rights. I’ve been disappointed.

If I had to guess, I’d say the LDS Church has taken the wrong lesson from the backlash of many American members against its “woke” positions in 2020-1 – racism bad, masks good, and Oaks’ own reminder that “we peacefully accept the results of elections.” I saw some members on Facebook tearing up their temple recommends after the prophet asked them to get vaccinated, which implies that they stopped paying tithing… but that’s just speculation on my part.

Somehow, without millions of followers, hundreds of billions of dollars, my own law firm, lobbyists, or government contacts, I’ve managed to find the courage to speak out unequivocally against fascism because once upon a time, I was taught, “Do what is right, let the consequence follow.”

I still believe that. I’m not sure if the people who taught me ever did.

I am a proud Aggie. I have two degrees from USU, but the most important things I learned there were critical thinking and empathy for people with different experiences from mine. These abilities changed my life in beautiful and profound ways, and as a graduate instructor, teaching them to my own students was my highest priority.

No wonder Republicans hate higher education.

On both the state and federal levels, the party of limited government is mandating what universities can teach, how they can teach, what they can research, whom they can hire, and which constitutionally protected speech they can grant to their students and faculty. The party of personal liberty is demanding that universities promulgate its disdain for marginalized people and its dishonest versions of history and science, or else.

This is textbook fascism, and it’s about as subtle as an exploding train full of glitter and fireworks.

Harvard recently stood up for its rights and set the example that all universities should follow. I call on my alma mater to follow and do everything possible to resist illegal and un-American encroachments on its own academic freedom and its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

(The acronym sounds less scary when you spell it out, huh?)

I know USU’s students and faculty are more powerful than the weak, incompetent bullies who seek to control them. The short-term costs of resisting fascism will be much less than the long-term damage to higher education if they bow down to it.

I'm Anglican. Grew up Mormon and all of my circles are basically either Mormon or exmormon. Anyways, the past year or two it seems like they've been having a heavy emphasis on holy week. Like, in conference there was a lot of references to palm Sunday. Nothing in a more traditional sense, but there was at least acknowledgement of holy week.

Anyways, I've also been seeing a lot of low quality missionary posts about holy week. Usually resulting in them misunderstanding the actual purpose of each day. For example, on holy Tuesday, a missionary shared a quote from the BoM about being cleansed through Christ. And they had something say "Are you trying to be clean through Christ" or something like that. Like, no actual skcnowledgement of what happned on that day in the bible.

The only reason I even knew about holy week growing up was because we got good Friday off in school. I can guarantee that holy week isn't something recognized normally by the LDS sect.

But with all these posts and everything, it honestly feels a little bit like appropriation. Like especially with the missionary posts. Basically, they're taking a week of holidays where you pay homage to the last week to the crucifixion by talking about verses that don't even allude to those events. It honestly feels like that thing where missionaries try to get in the door by talking about the Bible. It just feels disingenuous and the whole event, dare I say, feels like the LDS church "playing protestantism".

​That being said, I'm all for Mormons wanting to and actually participating in holy week. But, the way I see it, you gotta respect the tradition.